Please, register yourself or login to submit a FREE Isabelinos Classified Ads! Login or click here to signup for FREE account. Admin
Home
Isabela Philippines Website
(Vatican) Woman attacks Pope PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 25 December 2009 09:45

Unhurt, Benedict XVI delivers Christmas blessing

Agence France-Presse, Associated Press
First Posted 00:21:00 12/26/2009

VATICAN CITY— A “psychologically unstable” woman in a red sweat shirt jumped the barriers in St. Peter’s Basilica and knocked down Pope Benedict XVI as he walked down the central aisle to start the Christmas Eve Mass.

But the 82-year-old Pontiff quickly got up unhurt and proceeded as planned with Thursday’s two-hour service, urging the faithful in his homily to “wake up” from selfishness and petty affairs and find time for God and spiritual matters.

In its formal statement on the episode that shocked the Catholic world, the Vatican identified the woman as Susanna Maiolo, 25, an Italian-Swiss national with psychiatric problems.

The Vatican spokesperson, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, said Maiolo had been sent to an undisclosed medical facility for “necessary treatment.”

Seeking to play down the incident, Lombardi praised Benedict’s “great self-control and control of the situation.”

“It was an assault, but it wasn’t dangerous because she wasn’t armed,” he said.

Lombardi said it was the second year in a row that Maiolo breached security at the Vatican’s Christmas Eve service.

At the end of last year’s Mass, Maiolo also jumped the barriers and got close to the Pope, but she was quickly blocked on the ground by security personnel. Maiolo was also wearing a red, hooded sweat shirt.

To the city and world

The attack did not stop Benedict from delivering on Friday his traditional Christmas blessing, although he appeared bit unsteady as he approached his chair on the loggia overlooking St. Peter’s Square and was steadied by an attendant.

The Pope spread open his arms, blessed the crowd and delivered his “Urbi et Orbi” speech, Latin for “To the city and the world,” without any problem. He followed with Christmas greetings in 65 different languages that drew sustained cheers and chants from the crowd.

In the speech, the Pope decried the effects of the world financial crisis, conflicts in the Holy Land and Africa, and the plight of the “tiny flock” of Christians in Iraq.

“At times it is subject to violence and injustice, but it remains determined to make its own contribution to the building of a society opposed to the logic of conflict and the rejection of one’s neighbor,” he said.

Video footage

Thursday’s incident was captured by a pilgrim on video, which showed Maiolo in a red, hooded sweat shirt vaulting over the wooden barriers beside the basilica’s main aisle and rushing toward the Pope.

As Maiolo grabbed Benedict’s vestments, security guards took the woman down. According to the Vatican statement, the Pope “lost his balance and he slipped to the floor.”

French Cardinal Roger Etchegaray, an 87-year-old Vatican diplomat, also fell to the floor “in the confusion.”

The security breach halted the Pope’s procession as it was making its way toward the main altar. The music stopped and shocked gasps rang out among the thousands who packed the basilica.

Benedict lost his miter and his staff in the fall. He remained on the ground for a few seconds before being helped back up by attendants.

At that point, shouts of “Viva il Papa!” (Long live the Pope!) rang out in the basilica, followed by cheers from the faithful.

Unshaken

Benedict, flanked by tense bodyguards, resumed his walk to the main altar to start the Mass. The Pope appeared unperturbed, although he leaned heavily on aides as he sat down on his chair.

He made no reference to the disturbance after the service started. As a choir sang, he sprinkled incense on the altar and opened the Mass with the traditional wish for peace in Latin.

“To wake up means to leave that private world of one’s own and to enter the common reality,” Benedict said in his homily.

“Conflict and lack of reconciliation in the world stem from the fact that we are locked into our own interests and opinions, into our own little private world.”

Fractured hip

Etchegaray fractured his hip in the commotion and would be operated on at Rome’s Gemelli hospital. Lombardi, however, said Etchegaray’s condition was good.

MaryBeth Burns from Paris, Texas, was about four people away from the woman who jumped the barriers and was filming the Pope’s procession when the commotion started.

“All of a sudden this person sort of flew over the barricade and the Holy Father went down and all the security people were on top of it, a whole pile there, getting her off and him back up,” said Burns, who was visiting Italy with her family on a religious pilgrimage for Christmas.

“I’m really mad because I had a perfect shot lined up,” she added. “I’m still shaking.”

Few people who were watching the Mass on giant screens outside a rain-soaked St. Peter’s Square noticed the Pope had fallen, with many saying either they weren’t looking or had arrived too late.

Too exposed

The incident was the first time a potential attacker came into direct contact with Benedict, underscoring concerns by security analysts who have frequently warned that the Pope is too exposed in his public appearances.

During an open-air audience in St. Peter’s Square in 2007, a mentally unstable German man jumped a security barrier and grabbed the back of the Pope’s open car before security guards swarmed over the attacker.

Then there was the 1981 assassination attempt by Turkish gunman Mehmet Ali Agca on Pope John Paul II, who suffered a severe wound in the abdomen. John Paul was shot as he was riding in an open jeep at the start of his weekly audience in the Vatican piazza.

The Pope is protected by a combination of Swiss Guards, Vatican police and Italian police.

Security searches lax

Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States, the Vatican has tightened security at papal events. All visitors must pass by police to get into the square, with those entering the basilica going through metal detectors or being scanned by metal-detecting wands.

But Sister Samira, an Indian aide to Vatican officials who attended the service and witnessed Thursday’s incident, said she had never been searched by security personnel whenever she attended papal Masses. She said the same held true for other people in religious garb.

Benedict celebrated this year’s Christmas Eve Mass two hours earlier than the usual midnight starting time in a move by the Vatican to ease the Pontiff’s busy holiday schedule.

Benedict has been remarkably healthy during his five-year pontificate, keeping to a busy schedule and traveling around the world.

In July, however, he broke his wrist during a late-night fall while vacationing in an Alpine chalet. He had to undergo minor surgery and wear a cast for a month.

 
(By Patricia Evangelista): David's Vote PDF Print E-mail
Written by Admin   
Thursday, 24 December 2009 11:17

By Patricia Evangelista
Philippine Daily Inquirer

It was June when David stepped out to meet Goliath. She will not go unchallenged, he said. She will not go unopposed. We will oppose her every step of the way.

Professor Randolf David said he knew it was foolish. President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s men questioned his intentions. This is not public service, they said, to run for congressional office for the sake of standing in the way of one person. And so the sociology professor answered, one afternoon in July, sitting among his books and his papers while the rain fell and the camera rolled. “I believe it is the greatest public service to stand in the way of the quintessential traditional politician seeking to perpetuate herself in office for life.”

There was fear that the President would launch herself into Congress, galvanize the sitting legislation into changing the Constitution, and later position herself as prime minister, an office without term limits. David said he may not win, but he would certainly make it difficult for her. Winning was not the issue. The Liberal Party threw its weight behind him, welcoming him as the official candidate of the group. The United Opposition took up his cause. There were feature stories, television interviews, newspaper columns, online forums, letters to the editor, fan pages on social networking sites, all featuring the grey-haired Don Quixote in the red bandanna who rode a Ducati to class and promised to take his sociology texts to the halls of Congress.

Of course there was denial that the President would actually run for Congress. It was not the time to speak of it, said the men and women who spoke for Malacañang. There were more important matters for the chief executive to focus on without having to deflect conspiracy theories. On Dec. 1, after hearing Mass at the St. Augustine Church in her hometown of Lubao, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, 14th President of the Republic of the Philippines and perhaps the most unpopular, filed her certificate of candidacy for the second congressional district of Pampanga.

“After much contemplation I realized I am not ready to step down completely from public service,” she said in a radio interview.

In the same week, David, public servant, head of the University of the Philippines’ Department of Sociology, announced in his Guagua, Pampanga ancestral home that he will not follow through with his plan to challenge President Arroyo for the second district. He told reporters that Ms Arroyo would create not only a lopsided fight but also an “unjust situation” for her rivals.

“What GMA’s minions have prepared for her in my district is not an election but a coronation. I cannot participate in this electoral travesty.” There was no doubt, he said in a column published in this section, that she would take the second district.

In the past five months, Ms Arroyo has visited the second district more than 50 times, cutting ribbons and glad-handing. As president of the republic, she has offered Pampanga the same programs and services that the rest of poverty-stricken Philippines has been clamoring for with little result, and the mayors applauded her coming.

And so David walked away from Goliath. He is right that the odds are unjust. David knew this more than anyone when he announced without prodding in June of this year that he would stand in the way of a rampaging Arroyo who even at that time was treating the second district as Malacañang’s backyard. But he forgets, this is the Philippines. Every day is a battle against impossible odds. Here, a man can be killed for having P20 more in his wallet than the next man in the FX to Cubao. You can survive two years as a baby sitter in a random Middle Eastern country and come home for Christmas to be raped, shot and buried under a television van just because you took the highway to the hospital. Education is no protection. A gated village is no protection. Sex, profession, numbers are no protection. The odds are worse for some, better for others, but in the end, an “unjust situation” is the state of the nation, not just in the second district of Pampanga.

It flies in the face of logic for Professor David to claim he walks away because the odds are unjust, then adds that now he is pressuring our countrymen to ask Arroyo to relinquish her powers. He is asking her to resign if she does not want to be impeached or removed from office. He is urging her to take the path of decency by refusing to run for any position less than president. The last six years have shown us that there is greater probability of a dancing gorilla in a glitter-spangled tutu winning the second district of Pampanga than there is of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo voluntarily giving up power. Yet Professor David himself asks for her to step down anyway, because sometimes, it matters simply to stand up and fight.

He is right that the chances of winning are slim, but sometimes odds do not matter. The people of Isabela proved this true when a polio victim from Bombo Radyo won against an entrenched dynasty. The people of Naga demonstrate this, term after term, whenever Jesse Robredo stands for office. And lest we forget, the people of Pampanga demonstrated this when an unknown priest without means or name put on a flak jacket and won as governor. It is the way of this country to disprove impossible odds.

When Arroyo declared her candidacy, an architect named Adonis Simpao stood up to take David’s place in the Liberal Party’s lineup. David’s sudden refusal made it nearly impossible for Simpao to prepare, as demonstrated by the fact even the LP’s Frank Drilon did not know his name after he filed his CoC, but he took his stand. David is afraid that by running, he would legitimize an Arroyo win. We have come to a point when nothing the President does is legitimate, and even if she won by a landslide against David, it would not have been a legitimate win in the eyes of anyone, I suspect not even in her own eyes. There is greater danger that David’s choice has created: it is the claim from a man of David’s weight and intellect that there is no value in the political exercise at a time when a nation has little more than a vote to make a difference.

This column is written not against a man, but against a principle. It is written as a protest against the idea that the possibility of failure is a reason to renege on public promises and deny a nation clinging to small hopes. What gave a nation hope was not the possibility that Randy David would win, it was the fact that Randy David took a stand. Hope is rare commodity now, and it is one that Professor David offered the nation last June. I write this because a man I respect claims that by fulfilling a promise he puts at risk “the authority I have carefully cultivated as a social analyst and public intellectual,” forgetting that authority depends on the choices a man makes. Mostly I write this because I know that God will not arrive with a phalanx of angels singing Hallelujah when the next president is sworn into power, and that long after May 2010 comes, we will still continue taking impossible stands, not because we will win, but because we must.

 
(By Artemio V. Panganiban): Uphold the Constitution PDF Print E-mail
Written by Admin   
Thursday, 24 December 2009 11:13

By Artemio V. Panganiban
Philippine Daily Inquirer


A newly appointed magistrate once asked me, “Mr. Chief Justice, how do you reconcile your sense of gratitude to the President who appointed you with your opinions overturning her actions?” This question nags the conscience of every new jurist, because gratitude is a cherished Filipino value.

Gratitude and duty. Thus, I had to be careful with my answer. First, I handed him a copy of my concurring opinion in David vs Arroyo (May 3, 2006) in which the Supreme Court nullified the “extraneous” provisions of Presidential Proclamation (PP) 1017 that gave President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo authoritarian powers similar to those granted by PP 1081 to Ferdinand Marcos. I pointed to the last paragraph that read:

“And even for those who care for the President, it is timely and wise for this Court to set down the parameters of power and to make known, politely but firmly, its dogged determination to perform its constitutional duty at all times and against all odds. Perhaps this country would never have had to experience the wrenching pain of dictatorship; and a past President would not have fallen into the precipice of authoritarianism, if the Supreme Court then had the courage to remind him steadfastly of his mortality and the inevitable historical damnation of despots and tyrants...”

Then, I explained that sometimes, the best way to show gratitude is to cast aside shortsighted gains in favor of a lasting legacy. Sometimes, the lure of the convenient and temporary blurs the vision of the heroic and permanent. Gratitude must cleanse blurred lenses and provide clarity of sight. To paraphrase the Good Book, what does it profit a president to rule the country indefinitely if she loses the judgment of history?

Justices take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. When a lawyer enters the inner sanctum of the Supreme Court, he or she leaves behind all humanity and becomes a god of the law, beholden only to blindfolded justice and loyal only to the Constitution and the rule of law. To paraphrase President Manuel Quezon, gratitude to the President ends where duty to the Constitution and the people begins.

Hesitation and vacillation. I recall this incident because I sense some hesitation and vacillation, not to say cleverness, in how the Supreme Court has so far treated the petitions assailing Presidential Proclamation (PP) 1959 that placed Maguindanao under martial law (ML).

The Constitution gives the high court only 30 days from the filing of the petitions on Dec. 7 to promulgate its decision. Yet, during its Dec. 8 en banc session, it merely asked for comment, without setting the case for oral argument, as it has done in previous urgent cases.

Then, on Dec. 15—after the President had lifted PP 1959—the Court‘s Public Information Office said that the Court had ordered all the parties to comment within 20 days on the issue of whether the petitions have been mooted by the lifting of ML. I wondered: was the Court setting the stage to dismiss the petitions summarily on the sole ground of mootness? Also, with the 20-day period for comments, it could no longer comply with the 30-day constitutional mandate for a decision.

A few days later, the resolution of Dec. 15 was released. It actually required the parties to comment not only on whether the lifting of ML mooted the petitions but also on five other issues: (1) whether the term “rebellion” used as a ground for ML has the same meaning as that in the Penal Code, (2) whether PP 1959 authorized warrantless arrests, searches and seizures, (3) whether ML is a “joint and sequential function of the President and Congress such that, without congressional action on the proclamation either affirming or revoking it, the President having in the meantime lifted the same, this Court has nothing to review”; (4) whether the power of the Court to review ML can be exercised simultaneously with the power of Congress to revoke it, and in case of conflict which would prevail, and (5) whether the Court’s judgment on the factual basis of ML is essential to the validity of related acts done when ML was in effect.

Some of these issues were never raised by the parties. But they can be cleverly turned to mangle the high-minded constitutional safeguards against creeping authoritarianism.

The Court faces a historic moment. It cannot cower or cop-out or hide behind legalisms. Worse, in a false sense of gratitude, it should not invent legal excuses to justify or cover plainly unconstitutional acts. Rare is the opportunity for greatness. Let the Court not squander the moment. Let it perform its duty forthrightly and uphold the Constitution.

* * *

TOYM awards. On behalf of the TOYM board of judges, which I chaired, I congratulate The Outstanding Young Men (and women) or TOYM of 2009: Joy Canon-Abaquin (for pioneering in “multiple intelligence” education), Roby Alampay (for his democracy and human rights advocacy in the Philippines, Burma and Vietnam), Tonnette Velasco-Allones (for upholding the career executive service in government), Rajo Laurel (for innovative arts and fashion design), Don Prisno (for promoting the rights, health and welfare of Filipino seafarers), and Vicky Morales-Reyno (for being the “best example of responsible broadcast journalism”).

Aside from me, the judges were PhilHealth president Rey Aquino, Ayala Foundation president Vicky Garchitorena, DAP chairman Antonio Kalaw, De la Salle University president Bro. Armin Luistro, and Naga City Mayor Jesse Robredo.

 
« StartPrev12NextEnd »

Page 2 of 2
isabelinos.net, Powered by Joomla! and designed by SiteGround web hosting